{"id":16904,"date":"2021-04-27T09:31:52","date_gmt":"2021-04-27T07:31:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/?p=16904"},"modified":"2024-11-27T15:32:43","modified_gmt":"2024-11-27T13:32:43","slug":"nejvyssi-soud-zamitl-dovolani-slavkova-u-brna-ve-veci-napoleonske-expozice-autorska-prava-byla-porusena","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/nejvyssi-soud-zamitl-dovolani-slavkova-u-brna-ve-veci-napoleonske-expozice-autorska-prava-byla-porusena\/","title":{"rendered":"Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud zam\u00edtl dovol\u00e1n\u00ed Slavkova u Brna ve v\u011bci napoleonsk\u00e9 expozice \u2013 autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va byla poru\u0161ena"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kdy\u017e jsme loni v \u010dervenci ozn\u00e1mili konec sporu o napoleonskou expozici ve Slavkov\u011b u Brna, proto\u017ee Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci vynesl pravomocn\u00fd rozsudek, v n\u011bm\u017e n\u00e1m dal ve sporu s m\u011bstem za pravdu, ukvapili jsme se. P\u0159esto, \u017ee mal\u00e9 m\u011bsto Slavkov u Brna ji\u017e do t\u00e9 doby vynalo\u017eilo jist\u011b nemal\u00e9 prost\u0159edky na sv\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed ve vlekouc\u00ed se soudn\u00ed bitv\u011b, hodlalo pokra\u010dovat, a podalo dovol\u00e1n\u00ed k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu. Sou\u010dasn\u011b nerespektovalo pravomocn\u00fd rozsudek, kter\u00fdm mu Vrchn\u00ed soud ulo\u017eil se autor\u016fm libreta zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 expozice omluvit. N\u00e1sledovala exekuce, kter\u00e1 prob\u00edh\u00e1, a kter\u00e9 se m\u011bsto paraleln\u011b a dosud rovn\u011b\u017e ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u011b br\u00e1n\u00ed. Dovol\u00e1n\u00ed Slavkova u Brna bylo usnesen\u00edm Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze 6. dubna, kter\u00e9 doru\u010den\u00edm z\u00a026. dubna nabylo pr\u00e1vn\u00ed moci, odm\u00edtnuto.<\/p>\n

Viz tak\u00e9: 8. \u010dervence 2020 – V\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00edm autor\u016f skon\u010dil po 7 letech spor o Napoleonskou expozici ve Slavkov\u011b u Brna<\/a><\/p>\n

M\u011bsto Slavkov u Brna poru\u0161ilo autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va autor\u016f libreta Jakuba Samka a Vladim\u00edra Ko\u010dana. Bez jejich souhlasu p\u0159edalo d\u00edlo ke zpracov\u00e1n\u00ed t\u0159et\u00ed stran\u011b – nekompetentn\u00edmu zhotoviteli, stavebn\u00ed firm\u011b z Brna. Sv\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edstupem jejich d\u00edlo znehodnotilo, jejich \u010detn\u00e9 p\u0159ipom\u00ednky ignorovalo, neumo\u017enilo jim v\u00fdkon autorsk\u00e9ho dozoru, a\u010d jejich zapracov\u00e1n\u00edm mohlo sporu p\u0159edej\u00edt, a znehodnocen\u00e9 d\u00edlo, pln\u00e9 chyb, nekvalitn\u00edch a nevhodn\u00fdch expon\u00e1t\u016f, text\u016f a dal\u0161\u00edch prvk\u016f zp\u0159\u00edstupnilo ve\u0159ejnosti. Autory nerespektovalo do t\u00e9 m\u00edry, \u017ee ani nebyli uvedeni jako auto\u0159i libreta na \u00favodn\u00edm panelu expozice. Expozici otev\u0159elo, ani\u017e by jej\u00ed vojensko-historick\u00fd obsah dodan\u00fd stavebn\u00ed firmou jakkoli v\u011bcn\u011b ov\u011b\u0159ilo. \u017d\u00e1dn\u00fd znalec napoleonsk\u00fdch d\u011bjin v\u00fdsledn\u00fd tvar expozice nepotvrdil jako spr\u00e1vn\u00fd a bezchybn\u00fd, a m\u011bsto ignorovalo tak\u00e9 p\u0159ipom\u00ednky sv\u00e9ho vlastn\u00edho historika, resp. historika sv\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvkov\u00e9 organizace, z\u00e1mku Slavkov-Austerlitz.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>V\u00fdsledek pr\u00e1ce zhotovitele v expozici, kterou se Slavkov u Brna cht\u011bl chlubit<\/em><\/p>\n

Spor se vlekl bezm\u00e1la osm let. Na jeho konci lze vystavit n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed \u00fa\u010det:<\/p>\n

– n\u00e1klady na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed m\u011bsta mohly b\u00fdt ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed, nebo dokonce \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 – sta\u010dila slu\u0161nost a ochota seri\u00f3zn\u011b diskutovat probl\u00e9my expozice, a\u0165 b\u011bhem pokus\u016f o mimosoudn\u00ed vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed, tak p\u0159ed pod\u00e1n\u00edm \u017ealoby samotn\u00e9;<\/p>\n

– nekvalitn\u00ed expozice byla v roce 2014 kosmeticky upravena, \u010d\u00edm\u017e se m\u011bsto pokusilo obej\u00edt probl\u00e9m s autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem. Motivace byla z\u0159ejm\u00e1 – vyhnout se probl\u00e9m\u016fm s poskytovatelem dotace a splnit p\u011btiletou udr\u017eitelnost tohoto z evropsk\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f spolufinancovan\u00e9ho projektu. S ohledem na d\u00e9lku soudn\u00edho sporu se to m\u011bstu poda\u0159ilo a expozice byla uzav\u0159ena ji\u017e p\u0159ed lo\u0148sk\u00fdm rozsudkem Vrchn\u00edho soudu;<\/p>\n

– p\u0159i realizaci v\u00fdznamn\u00e9ho projektu spolufinancovan\u00e9ho z fond\u016f Evropsk\u00e9 unie bylo poru\u0161eno autorsk\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo.<\/p>\n

Auto\u0159i o\u010dek\u00e1vaj\u00ed omluvu m\u011bsta Slavkov u Brna \u017ealobou po\u017eadovan\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem. Bude krajn\u011b ned\u016fstojn\u00e9, bude-li m\u011bsto pokra\u010dovat ve sv\u00fdch obstrukc\u00edch a bude-li se t\u0159eba v\u00fdkonu pravomocn\u00e9ho rozsudku, nyn\u00ed potvrzen\u00e9ho Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm soudem, i nad\u00e1le dom\u00e1hat exekuc\u00ed. Nejen tento rozm\u011br sporu, tedy nerespektov\u00e1n\u00ed pravomocn\u00e9ho rozsudku, dob\u0159e ilustruje p\u0159\u00edstup Slavkova u Brna k cel\u00e9 v\u011bci, kter\u00e1 krom\u011b dal\u0161\u00edho za\u017eila odvol\u00e1n\u00ed soudce Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Brn\u011b pro podjatost.<\/p>\n

Auto\u0159i od za\u010d\u00e1tku v\u011b\u0159ili, \u017ee jsou v pr\u00e1vu, \u017ee jejich v\u00fdhrady jsou podlo\u017een\u00e9 a spr\u00e1vn\u00e9. Nyn\u00ed je na ob\u010danech m\u011bsta, aby se sv\u00e9 radnice zeptali, jak vysok\u00e9 ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 prost\u0159edky a s jak\u00fdm v\u00fdsledkem vynalo\u017eilo na obhajobu sv\u00e9ho postoje. Uvid\u00edme tak\u00e9, jak se k probl\u00e9mu nyn\u00ed postav\u00ed instituce, je\u017e maj\u00ed dohl\u00ed\u017eet na \u00fa\u010deln\u00e9 vynalo\u017een\u00ed evropsk\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f.<\/p>\n

Jakub Samek, Vladim\u00edr Ko\u010dan<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dovol\u00e1n\u00ed Slavkova u Brna bylo usnesen\u00edm Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze 6. dubna, kter\u00e9 doru\u010den\u00edm z 26. dubna nabylo pr\u00e1vn\u00ed moci, odm\u00edtnuto.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":16330,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[129,1,121],"tags":[6321,6324,6262,6320,6323,6263,6322],"class_list":["post-16904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nezobrazovat-na-homepage","category-aktuality","category-kauza-expozice","tag-dovolani","tag-exekuce","tag-napoleonska-expozice","tag-nejvyssi-soud","tag-rozsudek","tag-slavkov-u-brna","tag-vrchni-soud"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16904"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16904\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16908,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16904\/revisions\/16908"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16330"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}