![](\"http:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/images\/ilustrace\/nap.jpg\")
<\/div>\nNa prvn\u00ed pohled je Net\u0159eba zast\u00edrat, \u017ee Projekt Austerlitz 2005 M\u00edsto smyslupln\u00e9 a vst\u0159\u00edcn\u00e9 a Na z\u00e1mku ve Slavkov\u011b v re\u017eii m\u00edstn\u00edho muzea prob\u011bhlo slavnostn\u00ed zah\u00e1jen\u00ed
vid\u011bt, \u017ee to nen\u00ed replika uniformy, ale ne moc padnouc\u00ed divadeln\u00ed kost\u00fdm.
Z\u00e1klad je spr\u00e1vn\u00fd, ale detaily velmi kulhaj\u00ed. Epolety jsou provizorn\u00ed, t\u0159\u00e1sn\u011b
vypadaj\u00ed jako z n\u011bjak\u00e9ho koberce. T\u011blo epolety by m\u011blo <\/span>b\u00fdt pod\u0161it\u00e9 \u010derven\u00fdm
suknem a m\u00edt dvojit\u00e9 obto\u010den\u00ed. Z\u00e1hadou je, jak "Napoleonovi" epoleta na
ramenou dr\u017e\u00ed – chyb\u011bj\u00ed mu toti\u017e poutka… Zcela chyb\u00ed n\u00e1kr\u010dn\u00edk (\u010dern\u00fd,
jsme-li ve v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9m stavu). Nesmysln\u00e9 jsou vol\u00e1nky na <\/span>ruk\u00e1vu ko\u0161ile, je\u017e
nav\u00edc vykukuj\u00ed zpod ruk\u00e1vu fraku… hr\u016fza! Takto upraven\u00e9ho d\u016fstojn\u00edka by
Napol\u00e9on asi potkal ve sv\u00e9 arm\u00e1d\u011b jen velmi nerad…<\/span>
Tvar klobouku
nen\u00ed z fotografie moc mo\u017en\u00e9 posoudit, chyb\u00ed ale knofl\u00edk a poutko kokardy,
kter\u00e1 je p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 velk\u00e1, \u0161patn\u011b um\u00edst\u011bn\u00e1 a nav\u00edc p\u0159ipevn\u011bn\u00e1 knofl\u00edkem, co\u017e by
b\u00fdt nem\u011bla.<\/span>
Zaj\u00edmav\u00e9 by bylo vid\u011bt tento frak zezadu, kde by m\u011bly b\u00fdt
kapsy "a la soubise", zlatem vy\u0161it\u00e9 horny na \u010derven\u00e9m sukn\u011b na ohybech \u0161os\u016f
(jsme-li v roce 1805, pak mus\u00ed ty ohyby b\u00fdt voln\u00e9 a jen sepnut\u00e9 h\u00e1\u010dky).
Knofl\u00edky nejsou p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 dob\u0159e vid\u011bt, m\u011bly by b\u00fdt vypoukl\u00e9 a bez jak\u00e9hokoli
ornamentu.<\/span>
Orel Velkok\u0159\u00ed\u017ee \u010cestn\u00e9 legie se nenos\u00ed p\u0159es rev\u00e9r. Zcela chyb\u00ed
(jsme-li u Slavkova) st\u0159\u00edbrn\u00fd k\u0159\u00ed\u017e \u010cestn\u00e9 legie a \u017delezn\u00e1 koruna komand\u00e9ra
\u0159\u00e1du (no\u0161en\u00e1 od \u010dervna 1805). Bez t\u011bchto dvou atribut\u016f si lze Napol\u00e9ona
p\u0159edstavit jen <\/span>obt\u00ed\u017en\u011b…<\/span>
Prav\u00e1 ruka nedbale zav\u011b\u0161en\u00e1 za palec ve
vest\u011b nen\u00ed v po\u0159\u00e1dku. Ruka m\u00e1 ve vest\u011b zmizet cel\u00e1 a je t\u0159eba k tomu
rozepnout t\u0159i knofl\u00edky. Takto no\u0161en\u00e1 ruka nebyla, jak se mnohdy tvrd\u00ed,
projevem n\u011bjak\u00fdch bolest\u00ed. Podle Bernarda <\/span>Coppense, belgick\u00e9ho historika, se
jednalo o slu\u0161n\u00e9 vychov\u00e1n\u00ed. "P\u0159edepisuje" to kniha LES REGLES DE LA
BIENSEANCE ET DE LA CIVILITE CHRETIENNE, jej\u00edm\u017e autorem byl Saint
Jean-Baptiste de la Salle (1651-1719). Ta \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee je neslu\u0161n\u00e9 ruce k\u0159\u00ed\u017eit
p\u0159es prsa, d\u00e1vat je za z\u00e1da, nebo jimi voln\u011b p\u0159i ch\u016fzi m\u00e1vat. V lev\u00e9 ruce m\u00e1
b\u00fdt vych\u00e1zkov\u00e1 h\u016fl, prav\u00e1 ruka m\u00e1 b\u00fdt na \u017ealudku zav\u011b\u0161en\u00e1 do otev\u0159en\u00e9 vesty.
Nen\u00ed-li h\u016fl, m\u00e1 b\u00fdt lev\u00e1 ruka voln\u011b sv\u011b\u0161ena pod\u00e9l boku, prav\u00e1 v\u0161ak z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 ve
vest\u011b. Takovou pozici pova\u017eoval autor, jeho\u017e Napol\u00e9on znal, za \u010destnou a
decentn\u00ed. (v\u00edce viz <\/span>http:\/\/www.1789-1815.com\/main_gilet.htm<\/a>)
Nenosil tak ruce ostatn\u011b zdaleka jen on s\u00e1m. Nebyl rozhodn\u011b d\u016fsledn\u00fd a \u010dasto
d\u00e1val ruce za z\u00e1da nebo je k\u0159\u00ed\u017eil p\u0159es prsa, ale strkat za vestu jen palec se
zd\u00e1 pon\u011bkud polovi\u010dat\u00e9 a vypad\u00e1 to hrozn\u011b.<\/span>
Celkov\u00fd dojem z tohoto
Napol\u00e9ona je rozpa\u010dit\u00fd. Je to sp\u00ed\u0161e jeho karikatura. Je samoz\u0159ejm\u011b velice
obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 zrekonstruovat c\u00edsa\u0159ovu uniformu a naj\u00edt \u010dlov\u011bka, kter\u00fd jej v\u011brn\u011b
zahraje. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b t\u00edmto pou\u0165ov\u00fdm Napol\u00e9onem slavkovsk\u00e9 muzeum d\u011bl\u00e1 z historie
tak trochu ve\u010dern\u00ed\u010dek o Trautenberkovi. N\u011bkter\u00fdm n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edk\u016fm to jist\u011b
nep\u0159ijde, n\u011bkter\u00fdm se to l\u00edb\u00ed, jin\u00e9 to pobav\u00ed, nikdo to jist\u011b nebere v\u00e1\u017en\u011b.
Slavkov bez Napol\u00e9ona by nebyl Slavkovem. Na druhou stranu se toho o c\u00edsa\u0159i a
jeho pobytu na Morav\u011b a ve Slavkov\u011b n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edk muzea mnoho nedozv\u00ed. Tento ochotn\u00edk je "alespo\u0148 n\u011bco", to n\u011bco je v\u0161ak zoufale amat\u00e9rsk\u00e9.<\/span>
Zpoza
c\u00edsa\u0159ova ramene na fotografii vykukuje hlava dal\u0161\u00edho ochotn\u00edka – pat\u0159\u00ed mu
role mar\u0161\u00e1la Berthiera. Ten je vytvo\u0159en zp\u016fsobem "vezememe ochotn\u00e9ho
a obl\u00e9kneme ho do modr\u00e9ho kab\u00e1tku s n\u011bjak\u00fdm zlat\u00fdm vy\u0161\u00edv\u00e1n\u00edm a na hlavu
mu d\u00e1me klobouk s n\u011bjak\u00fdm b\u00edl\u00fdm pe\u0159\u00edm", za dal\u0161\u00ed koment\u00e1\u0159
nestoj\u00ed.<\/span>
N\u011bkomu mo\u017en\u00e1 toto "r\u00fdp\u00e1n\u00ed" p\u0159ijde zbyte\u010dn\u011b punt\u00ed\u010dk\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9. Mo\u017en\u00e1
\u017ee je. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b muzeum si o n\u011b vylo\u017een\u011b \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, proto\u017ee se sv\u00fdm Napoleonem jako
jednou z opravdu m\u00e1la sv\u00fdch "napoleonsk\u00fdch" v\u011bc\u00ed chlub\u00ed. A nebude-li v
muzeu otev\u0159ena nov\u00e1 expozice, pak spolu s tou starou bude tento Napoleon
t\u00edm jedin\u00fdm, co muzeum ve Slavkov\u011b u Brna nab\u00eddne on\u011bm desetit\u00edc\u016fm
prosincov\u00fdch n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edk\u016fm.<\/span><\/p>\n
a C.E.N.S. maj\u00ed se slavkovsk\u00fdm z\u00e1mkem ji\u017e del\u0161\u00ed dobu problematick\u00e9 vztahy. Je
to proto, \u017ee zoufal\u00e1 pasivita a \u010dir\u00fd amat\u00e9rismus muzea se n\u00e1m velmi t\u011b\u017eko
vysv\u011btluje v kontaktu s na\u0161imi zahrani\u010dn\u00edmi partnery. P\u0159i opakovan\u00fdch snah\u00e1ch
upozor\u0148ovat zprvu muzeum samotn\u00e9 a posl\u00e9ze i jeho z\u0159izovatele na neut\u011b\u0161en\u00fd
stav v\u011bc\u00ed, kter\u00fd je vizitkou n\u00e1s v\u0161ech – nebo\u0165 zahrani\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edk n\u00e1s
rozli\u0161ovat nebude – nar\u00e1\u017e\u00edme na nez\u00e1jem.<\/p>\n
dlouhodob\u00e9 spolupr\u00e1ce, jej\u00edm\u017e v\u00fdsledkem mohla zcela re\u00e1ln\u011b b\u00fdt nap\u0159\u00edklad
velk\u00e1 akce oslavuj\u00edc\u00ed zah\u00e1jen\u00ed nov\u00e9 (smyslupln\u00e9) sez\u00f3ny za \u00fa\u010dasti stovek
voj\u00e1k\u016f (bez n\u00e1klad\u016f pro muzeum) a s bohat\u00fdm programem, propagovan\u00e1 v
zahrani\u010d\u00ed, jsme byli jen nep\u0159\u00edm\u00fdmi sv\u011bdky dal\u0161\u00edho projevu provinci\u00e1ln\u00ed
omezenosti. M\u00edsto \u017e\u00e1douc\u00ed koordinace aktivit p\u0159i p\u0159\u00edprav\u00e1ch dvousetlet\u00e9ho
v\u00fdro\u010d\u00ed bitvy u Slavkova, jeho\u017e hlavn\u00edm organiz\u00e1torem, muzeum dovol\u00ed, bude
Projekt Austerlitz 2005, tu je program uva\u0159en\u00fd z toho, co "d\u016fm dal", nav\u00edc
bez propagace v zahrani\u010d\u00ed (tu jsme nap\u0159\u00edklad schopni zajistit velmi \u00fa\u010dinn\u011b –
jen by o to musel n\u011bkdo projevit z\u00e1jem). Je to pohodln\u00e9. Desetit\u00edce
n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edk\u016f stejn\u011b p\u0159ijedou (kv\u016fli akci Projektu Austerlitz 2005), do muzea
stejn\u011b p\u0159ijdou a vstupn\u00e9 stejn\u011b zaplat\u00ed. Pro\u010d se tedy o n\u011bco sna\u017eit…
my\u0161lenka, \u017ee by t\u0159eba atraktivn\u00ed program a zaj\u00edmav\u00e1 expozice p\u0159im\u011bla mnoh\u00e9
n\u00e1v\u0161t\u011bvn\u00edky o Slavkov\u011b by\u0165 jen hezky mluvit s p\u0159\u00e1teli, je asi pro n\u011bkter\u00e9
lidi p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 slo\u017eit\u00e1.
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9 sez\u00f3ny, sez\u00f3ny dvousetlet\u00e9ho v\u00fdro\u010d\u00ed bitvy u Slavkova. „Mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b“ v\u0161e prob\u011bhlo obvykle – v\u010detn\u011b okost\u00fdmovan\u00e9ho Napoleona, bez propagace a bez spolupr\u00e1ce s Projektem Austerlitz 2005 i s C.E.N.S.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[129,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nezobrazovat-na-homepage","category-aktuality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17736,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187\/revisions\/17736"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}