{"id":77,"date":"2003-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-12-06T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/2003\/09\/07\/who-is-the-liar-is-it-us-or-the-army\/"},"modified":"2017-12-10T12:12:54","modified_gmt":"2017-12-10T11:12:54","slug":"who-is-the-liar-is-it-us-or-the-army","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/who-is-the-liar-is-it-us-or-the-army\/","title":{"rendered":"Who is the liar? Is it us or the army?"},"content":{"rendered":"



In our discussions with different politicians we have registered the information about the army\u2019s representatives trying to convince them that it would be a great mistake not to build the radar on our territory. They are also telling them that the radar in the landscape wouldn\u2019t look like as we show it on our website. To defend ourselves and to show who is not saying the truth and trying to distort the reality we offer you several examples of statements of the army or its representatives and what documents they present to the public: \u201cMiroslav Jandora alleges the distance of 3,2 km on the view Nr. 3 and the radar is barely visible while on the view Nr. air jordan soldes<\/a> 5 the radar is ca. Adidas Soldes<\/a> 3 times bigger than on the view Nr. 3. nike air max 1 pas cher<\/a> ugg bottes<\/a> On the view Nr. adidas messi 2017<\/a> 2 then the radar is bigger than on the view Nr. 4 where it is in fact 400 m closer and on the view Nr. 6 it is again of the same size as on the view Nr. nike cortez<\/a> 4 although the Nr. 4 is whole 1,3 km closer\u2026\u201d On the views from the far distance the cameras of the army or their representatives probably magnify and this happens on the distance of 60 m only. nike air max classic bw soldes<\/a> On the view Nr. 1 the radar is smaller than the pole on the right. baskets adidas<\/a> However according to the estimates towards the nearby real constructions the pole shouldn\u2019t higher than ca. chaussure nike cortez<\/a> air jordan pour homme pas cher<\/a> 16-18 m, the radar itself is supposed to be ca. 28 m high. nike roshe run<\/a> Whom to trust then? We just add that the visualisation was provided by the investor not until he was asked to do so, particularly at the territorial proceedings on July 29th 2003. Till that time none of the representatives of the communities had an idea of the real look of the radar. nike tn<\/a> Based on the abovementioned \u201cfacts\u201d provided by the investor himself it is clear who is not saying the truth. For our own visualisations click HERE.<\/P>

Finally we would like to stress that it is also our interest to build the radar in the Czech Republic but not on the Pratzen Heights next to the Peace Monument.<\/P><\/FONT>









































 <\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



This is the complete presentation of the representative of the investor who is presenting whole the project.<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

 <\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



View Nr. 1 – Overall panoramic view<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

 <\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



View Nr. basket adidas zx flux<\/a> 2 – Overall panoramic view<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



On the view Nr. 1 the radar is smaller than the pole on the right<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



View Nr. asics soldes<\/a> 2 with the alleged distance of 1,4 m<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



On the view Nr. 3 the alleged distance is 3,2 m and the radar is barely visible<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



View Nr. 4 with the alleged distance of 1 km, the radar is smaller than on the view Nr. 2\u2026<\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



\u2026while on the view Nr. 5 (alleged distance 3,8 km) the radar is ca. 3 times bigger than on the view Nr. 3 <\/FONT><\/P><\/TD><\/TR>

<\/A><\/TD><\/TR>



On the view Nr. 6 (alleged distance 2,3 km) the radar is of the same size as on the view Nr. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In our discussions with different politicians we have registered the information about the army\u2019s representatives trying to convince them that it would be a great mistake not to build the radar on our territory. They are also telling them that the radar in the landscape wouldn\u2019t look like as we show it on our website. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1255,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77\/revisions\/1255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.austerlitz.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}